�
Nanotechnology and synthetic biology are deuce of the most exciting fields in science. They are the focus of venture capitalists, government and university laboratories, major corporations, and startup companies.
But how much accept Americans heard about these two fields that anticipate to change virtually every aspect of their lives - from sources of energy, to drugs and health guardianship, and even weapons? Does the public think the potential benefits of these emerging technologies will preponderate the possible risks?
These questions were region of a representative national telephone appraise of adults conducted in August 2008. This latest poll repeats questions about nanotechnology asked in a similar survey carried verboten in 2007 - which found that only 6 percent of Americans aforesaid they had "heard a lot" about nanotechnology despite the fact that the technology was incorporated into more than $147 1000000000000 in manufactured goods last year.
The poll also marks the first time Americans have been asked in a phone survey almost synthetic biology. This is an emerging area of research that uses sophisticated science and engineering to make or redesign living organisms, such as bacterium, so that they potty carry out specific functions.
Results from the poll - as well as from two complementary focus group discussions conducted among grownup men and women around synthetic biology - will be released by the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies on Tuesday, September 30th at 12:30 p.m. at a programme and live webcast at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
Geoffrey Garin, president of Peter D. Hart Research Associates, which conducted the phone appraise and focus groups, will present the findings.
To attend event, RSVP to nano@wilsoncenter.org. No RSVP is required to view the webcast.
*** Webcast LIVE at hTTP://www.wilsoncenter.org ***
What: Results of Nanotechnology & Synthetic Biology Public Opinion Poll
When: Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 12:30 - 1:30 PM
(Light lunch available at 12:00 noon)
Who:
Geoffrey Garin, President, Peter D. Hart Research Associates
Abigail Davenport, Vice President, Peter D. Hart Research Associates
David Rejeski, Director, Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies
Where:
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 5th Floor Conference Room, in the Ronald Reagan Building at 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. For directions examine: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/directions
Notes:
The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies was launched in 2005 by the Wilson Center and The Pew Charitable Trusts. It is a partnership dedicated to helping byplay, governments, and the populace anticipate and manage the possible health and environmental implications of nanotechnology.
To study more more or less the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, visit www.nanotechproject.org/.
Source:
Colin Finan
Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies
More info
Friday, 5 September 2008
Tuesday, 26 August 2008
Mp3 music: Basic Channel
 Artist: Basic Channel: mp3 download Genre(s): Techno Basic Channel's discography:  Basic Channel 08 Year: 1994 Tracks: 3 Basic Channel has become synonymous with a brand of stripped, ultra-minimal techno near free of musical kernel or purport. Both creative person and tag, Basic Channel was established by Berlin-based producers Mark Ernestus and Moritz Von Oswald (aka Maurizio) in 1993, and the couple have unhurriedly developed a slender simply idolised catalog of releases under such names as Cyrus, Phylyps, q1.1, Quadrant, Octagon, and Radiance -- working a single-minded concept of most featureless machine music ("nigh," of course of study, universe the florida key to the music's success). Like many German techno artists and labels (Tresor, Studio 1, Mike Ink), Basic Channel harbors a fear for early Chicago blistering and house and first-wave Detroit techno, the latter of which in particular is manifested in Mark and Moritz's ultraconservatism with respect to round and piece of music. Releasing under a twelve 12-inches since their origin (a few of them, however, nearing album length), Basic Channel issued their first fundament CD-release in 1996 (the group otherwise stay on staunch vinyl addicts -- they fifty-fifty assembled their own pressure readiness) in 1996. Titled just Basic Channel, the disk was a continuously mixed sampler of their 12-inch releases, which go to slobber Basic Channel is one in a network of artists and labels likewise including Thomas Koner/Porter Ricks, the Chain Reaction judge (more than avant experimental techno), M (Moritz's personal label and home to his Maurizio releases), the Main Street label (pop house), and Imbalance (a CD-only observational music label). |
Vietnam to deport Gary Glitter to Britain
Saturday, 16 August 2008
"In His Sights": Stalking victim's memoir is a chronicle of sick mind games
CHICAGO � The woman in the blue suit striding briskly into the Sofitel Hotel near O'Hare airport looked like any other 50-something businesswoman on her mode to a meeting. And in a way she was, a marketing consultant and mercenary writer visiting from her hometown several hundred miles away.
But the woman flew to Chicago last Friday on a strangely hole-and-corner errand: a newspaper interview that she gave under an false name. Afterward, she checked into a hotel business district under a different fake identity.
Then she returned to her home in the woods on the Mississippi River, where she has tried, with only partial success, to carve out a peaceable existence afterwards more than a decennary of existence stalked by a former boyfriend.
The fair sex, writing under the nominate Kate Brennan, has published a book, "In His Sights: A True Story of Love and Obsession" (Harper, $24.95), one of the first full-length memoirs of a stalk victim. She describes a campaign of surveillance, break-ins, severed earpiece lines and creepy confrontations after her decision to leave "Paul," a charming but distant adventurer with serious relationship issues.
The stalk, which continues sporadically today, is at once outlandish, terrifying and, owing to Paul's inscrutable pockets, maddeningly relentless and difficult to trace, according to the book. It led the author to move 16 times in 16 months, she writes.
"It got to the detail with Paul," Brennan recalled while sitting on a pastel couch in the hotel anteroom, "where if my car and my house hadn't been tampered with and I hadn't gotten a threatening phone call and I'd been able to do my work, that was a good day."
Brennan, 58, a blunt, jaunty woman wHO comes across as nobody's idea of a dupe, said she hoped her memoir would help give voice to the one thousand thousand women and several one C thousand workforce who, according to government statistics, ar stalked each year in this country, usually by ex-lovers.
Her decisiveness, on the one bridge player, to possibly provoke her stalker by writing the book, merely on the other to preserve some privacy by giving herself and her stalker pseudonyms is, she acknowledges, severe to explain. It sure as shooting complicates how the rule book will be received in a publishing environment where the put-on memoir has become its own exploding subgenre.
Brennan aforesaid that one time she had determined to tell her story, adopting a nom de guerre "felt like the one thing I could do that had any possible action of minimizing the danger." Her rightful identity and that of Paul were revealed to The New York Times so that the paper could confirm the outlines of her case.
The Times reviewed police reports, confirmed biographical information about Brennan and Paul on the Internet and spoke by telephone to the late detective wHO handled Brennan's case. On meeting, Brennan showed the reporter a current passport issued under her real name. The photo matched, and stamps in the passport matched trips described in her book.
Brennan's sneak was never violent to her; he never even directly threatened to scathe her. But one of the more than disturbing truths to emerge in the book is that if you are determined to turn someone's world inverted, mess with her head and destruct any colour of ordering in her life, and if you have the money and connections to hire people to do it for you, at that place is not much that anyone, including the constabulary, can do to stop you, despite anti-stalking laws in every state.
Perhaps only a crazy person would do such a thing, but there are a lot of crazy people out on that point. And though stalkers have many different psychological profiles and motivations, psychologists and criminologists world Health Organization have studied them have found that most ar driven by a motivation to control others, to prove that they cannot be excised from a life with a simple Dear John.
Trouble from the start
Brennan, then a 41-year-old college writing teacher and Bronte learner in a biggish city in the Midwest (its real discover is not hard to guess from the book), met Paul, a freelance photographer, in 1991 at a party and was impressed by his worldliness.
A few weeks after they started dating, Paul's father, a affluent businessman, was brutally murdered. (In the interview, Brennan said she fictionalized some details of the murder to camouflage the identity of Paul's family and altered the physical descriptions of Paul and others, but non the events in the book.)
When Brennan's new swain grew more than erratic after the mangle, Brennan, world Health Organization grew up in an alcoholic household and was drawn, she writes, to unbalanced yet controlling manpower, chalked it up to the recent trauma.
"I kind of gave him a pass," she said. "I gave him a bunch of passes."
After a year, she stirred in with him. Paul's protestations of love grew louder even as his interest in Brennan waned. Former girlfriends floated in and out of his life, as did a network of ex-con friends, some of whom he introduced as computer hackers. After Paul started asking Brennan repeatedly if it scared her that he kept a gun in the house, she touched out. It was June 1994.
Paul called her over again and over again, begging her to come back. He drove by her house. He canceled her mail-forwarding order. Then, Brennan said, Paul stopped contacting her flat, and the more originative harassment began.
His friends called her to tell her where Paul had seen her the day before and that he was angry she had left. Her earpiece started sledding dead. Her 20-year account history with the sound company was deleted. Just before Brennan arrived to visit a brother at a summer house in Maine, Paul called the brother's unlisted number. A few days later, she was out hiking when a alien approached and said: "I've been observance you. You're alone now, aren't you?"
No matter how many times Brennan changed the locks, she writes, her apartment was entered and subtly rearranged. "I find a bar of soap from the second-floor bathroom on the third-floor kitchen counter," she writes. "A teaspoonful from a kitchen drawer lies on the middle of my bed."
Mark Wynn, a retired police lieutenant and a consultant on stalking world Health Organization advises the U.S. Justice Department, aforementioned micro-tampering in a victim's life is not unusual. "I've in reality worked cases as a police investigator where the offender would do similarly bizarre things," he said. "It's the constant behaviour that the offender wants the dupe to know, 'I'm here, and I can get to you.' "
After Paul bought the house across from Brennan's apartment, she went to the police. "They checked into things," she said, "just what they came up with was what I thought they would � which was what could be proven, which was, really, that he moved in across the street from me."
A detective suggested a restraining order, simply she was wary of confronting Paul in court.
When the police force brought Paul in for questioning, he denied harassing Brennan and said it was his wife's decisiveness � he had marital � to buy the house across from hers, according to the law report.
"He had every 'tell' of a guilty man," the investigator who took Brennan's first complaints and interviewed Paul said, speaking anonymously because it is against the policy of the detective's current way to mouth on the record. The detective said Paul was informed that if anything happened to Brennan, he would be a suspect. It was all the police could do.
Brennan touched. But no matter where she went, she says, the molestation continued for years � at her home, at her jobs.
Writing as empowerment
After she touched two geezerhood ago to a pocket-sized town where her home has deep roots, the harassment narrowing off. She decided to write her book. "There was a point at which I thought, 'This is the biggest story in my life right now, and if it were anything else, I would be writing a book about it. And am I going to give that to him, too?' 4% I decided no."
She chose to write anonymously, she said, because "I don't want to heighten the peril to me and/or mass close to me by forcing his hand." The Times did not endeavor to contact Paul, which was a condition on which Brennan volunteered his name; she hopes he will non learn of her book.
Brennan's editor at HarperCollins, Jennifer Barth, aforementioned that when she told the source her write up would stimulate to be vetted, Brennan offered constabulary and psychotherapist reports.
"She had the sense that the onus is on you to raise your account," Barth said.
In an age of James Frey and JT LeRoy and, most recently, Margaret Seltzer, whose memoir of growing up in Los Angeles gangs proved fictional (and was withdrawn by its publisher), Brennan slaked HarperCollins lawyers, Barth said. For the article, this reporter besides spoke to Brennan's clinical psychologist, who saw Brennan on and off for 15 years, by and large for kinship problems, she said. The therapist, whose name was provided on the condition it not be used, said there was "no chance" Brennan was inventing her story.
Last September, as Brennan was finishing her manuscript, her phone went dead once more. The military service technician, she said, told her the line had been cut and reattached to some other line. He could offer no explanation. Brennan was angry just not surprised: She false it was Paul or one of his agents.
"I don't have any expectation that I would of all time, in a legal way, that I would have any justice," she said. "That's non even in the region of what I call back will materialize in my life."
She aforementioned she did not require the harassment to get much worsened, nor did she expect it to get better.
"I think it's a game for him," she aforementioned. "Much more than fun to just mess with me and spoil my life in this way and constantly remind me I can't get rid of him, that he's got control over me."
Her hope, she said, is to outlive her stalker.
"The only if way that I'll know the stalking will stop," she said, "is if he's dead."
More info
Thursday, 7 August 2008
Miley Cyrus' CD is pure pop with a touch of maturity
CD review |
Like all teenagers, Miley Cyrus is starting to learn about choices and consequences. Like most teen entertainers, she is besides becoming wise to the ways of making choices that will produce the most favourable consequences.
Coming on the heels of l'affaire Vanity Fair, Cyrus' new album, "Breakout," finds the Disney Channel star reversive to her factory setting of trying to please most of the people most of the time, without completely obscuring her own songwriting voice.
She largely succeeds on this appealing, compact album that was released final week. It offers her young fans a morsel of every current
Friday, 27 June 2008
Monday, 23 June 2008
El Chivo
Artist: El Chivo
Genre(s):
Rap: Hip-Hop
Discography:
Si Ladran No Muerden
Year: 2004
Tracks: 17
Wachate Con Los Topes
Year: 2002
Tracks: 19
Pino Daniele
Wednesday, 18 June 2008
Rosetta Stone
Artist: Rosetta Stone
Genre(s):
Rock
Discography:
The Tyranny Of Inaction
Year: 1995
Tracks: 9
Goth rock outfit Rosetta Stone started in 1988 when vocalist/guitarist Porl King and bassist Karl North yearned to leak the traditional Brit-pop scene occurrence in their native Liverpool. A year later, the couple met the Mission's Wayne Hussey, wHO offered to produce Rosetta Stone's starting time album. Shortly thenceforth, Hussey pulled prohibited of production duties and 1990's self-titled album was released without him. Several singles were put out through the '90s, and Rosetta Stone issued their starting time uncut, Epinephrine, in 1993. Foundation Stones and the Epitome EP also followed that same year. It was during this time that Rosetta Stone lead the naturally overlooked goth rock/darkwave movement into other musical outlets. Bands such as Nine Inch Nails and the Cult were getting brief national exposure. Drawing from musical influences such as Sisters of Mercy, Bauhaus, and the Cure, Rosetta Stone was delving into their have sonic seascape of brooding vocals and synth-inspired sounds. The band returned with Tyranny of Inaction in 1995 and Concealing in Waiting in 1996 piece establishing themselves as peerless of Cleopatra's house names. Their fifth album, Chemical, was released in 1998 and the band continued to carry the gothic blowlamp into the mainstream rock candy & roll circuit. Two years later, Rosetta Stone issued their biggest release, Unerotica.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)